Archive
Recognising the Real Problem?
Regeneration aims to bring opportunity to areas that are in decline, and to empower people to take advantage of those opportunities. The decline of an area is often caused in the first instance by structural economic change and a reduction in employment. Parts of the UK have experienced substantial deindustrialisation and loss of jobs since the 1970s, particularly during deep recessions in the early 1980s and early 1990s. In some areas there has been a rapid turnaround in employment; in others a cycle of decline has been set off.
Unlocking the Talent of Communities – DCLG 2008
This is a fairly standard analysis of the reasons for decline.
When industries pulled out things went wrong.
I believe things went wrong when the big employers moved in.
Policy and practice focused on providing a largely compliant workforce that was fit for purpose. Employer engagement ruled. All parties were more or less happy with the deal. At the time, and for many years after, it (arguably) worked reasonably well.
A bureaucratic mindset prevailed – characterised by patriarchal contracts between workers and employers which rewarded compliance. Industrialists and managers came up with the plans. Unions negotiated for pay and conditions and the majority just had to pick sides and choose leaders – on whom they felt they could depend.
A deep mindset of dependence set in. Dependence on employers, dependence on unions. DEPENDENCE. Generations learned how to successfully play the dependence game. Many still play it.
Entrepreneurial qualities were lost. Autonomy was devalued.
The genesis of the problem was not when the industries left, it was when they arrived.
For nearly 30 years now I think policy has largely neglected this deep change of identity, personality and self image that swept through many of these communities.
If we are serious about unlocking talent, then as well as providing skills training, CV clinics, classes in self employment, business planning and entrepreneurship we have also to tackle these issues of identity, personality and self image. And this is best done through conversation – not classes.
Challenging, caring, compassionate but powerful conversations. Conversations that accept, catalyse and confront. Conversations that are characterised by high trust and strong relationships. Conversations that are genuinely focused on helping to unlock potential and to enable potential to develop. Conversations that start from where people are at – and follow them where they need to go. Not the usual conversations that steer people towards opportunities predefined by the planners.
Instead we breeze into these communities and ask naive questions;
- Have you got a great business idea?
- Ever thought of starting a social enterprise?
Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals
Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people. The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.
Are You Biased Towards the Present?
A paper published by the UK Government’s Parliamentary Office for Science and Technology provides a useful reminder that people do not always/often make rational decisions, and that one of the reasons for the irrationality is a bias for the present.
In short this means that we put off or never do things that are in our own best interest simply because we see the pay-off being to far away in the future. Hence we stay fat and smoke – because any benefits of giving up won’t be experienced for ages.
It transpires that the poorer you are the more likely you are to show this bias for the present over the future.
This bias would seem to be important for enterprise professionals to :
- recognise,
- understand and
- overcome
Any tips you want to share for helping cleints overcome their bias towards the present?
You can read the full OST paper on Delaying Gratification here.
Enterprise Education Wrongly Understood?
Shout out to Gareth Sear for putting me onto this from TeacherNet:
Enterprise education consists of enterprise capability supported by better financial capability and economic and business understanding. Young people need opportunities to be enterprising through applying their knowledge, skills and attributes — to ‘make their mark’
Learners are expected to take personal responsibility for their own actions through an enterprise process that involves four stages.
- Stage 1 — tackling a problem or need: students generate ideas through discussion to reach a common understanding of what is required to resolve the problem or meet the need.
- Stage 2 — planning the project or activity: breaking down tasks, organising resources, deploying team members and allocating responsibilities.
- Stage 3 — implementing the plan: solving problems, monitoring progress.
- Stage 4 — evaluating the processes: reviewing activities and final outcomes, reflecting on lessons learned and assessing the skills, attitudes, qualities and understanding acquired.
Enterprise education consists of enterprise capability? Very enlightening!
Young people need opportunities to be enterprising? Young people are enterprising. Really enterprising. They have to be.
Even the ones who are quiet, shy and withdrawn are being enterprising. This is their ‘best plan’ for how to get by in life. Our job is to help them find a better, more powerful one that will help them fulfil their potential. Or to at least recognise the possibility.
Once again this all pervading direct linking of enterprise education with ‘financial capability, economic and business understanding’. Why?
Why not link it to sociological understanding? Or to psychology?
Why not link it to the Romantic poets and their descriptions of the transformational power of imagination and vision?
Why not link it to History and the power of some individuals to shape the course of civilisation? Hitler, Gandhi, Mandela as case studies in enterprise.
Why link it to money?
Why take such a utilitarian approach to enterprise?
In pursuing a narrow definition we are likely to turn students off rather than on. And certainly we will turn off other teaching staff who will continue to see enterprise education as just an extension of business studies, another example of the corruption of education by capitalism.
Learners are expected to take personal responsibility it says. Enterprise is the ultimate lesson in taking responsibility. It is only when we are enterprising – really living our lives in tune with our convictions that we have to take responsibility. All the time we operate in more bureaucratic modes we can duck responsibility by blaming others. “Sorry guv’ just following orders”.
There is nothing very enterprising about reaching a common understanding – although it is a valuable skill. It is holding a different understanding and having the courage to live by it that characterises enterprise. Seth Godin has just written on this.
And then the soulless linear process of develop an idea, develop a plan, implement it and then learn from it. The enterprising process is all about ups and downs; it is about emotions and resilience more than it is about ‘problem solving’ and ‘deploying team members’.
It is no wonder that we are struggling to embed enterprise in the curriculum.
Powerful Question or Cliche?
Interesting post over at SAMBA blog about the power of the:
What would you do if you knew you couldn’t fail?
question.
Does it make you a powerful life transformer – or just another cliche ridden life coach?
There is no doubt IMHO that this is potentially a life changing question.
It IS also a cliche.
What makes the difference is the nature of the relationship that you have with the person who you are asking.
If you have respect, credibility and trust – then the question will be taken on board.
Ask it too early though and you will be just another cliche ridden life coach.
For me, enterprise and entrepreneurship are great processes through which people can ‘find themselves’ and allow their true identity to emerge.
Done well this is a thing of beauty.
I have written more about this topic at http://tinyurl.com/djxwsx and http://tinyurl.com/aqgweq
The art of ‘enterprise coaching’ is not just about having great questions – it is also about having the relationship that permits you to ask them.
And we should never be afraid of asking the BIG, SCARY questions – but we must have the right relationship first.
Enterprise Evangelist or Enterprise Coach?
| Enterprise Evangelist | Enterprise Coach |
| Entrepreneurship is a good thing – you should try it. | Entrepreneurship is neither good not bad. For some people it is a wonderful life affirming experience. For others an unmitigated disaster. |
| We can turn your ideas and dreams into reality. | You can make progress in getting the kind of life that you want. My sole purpose is to offer you the help and support that you need on your journey. |
| We need to increase the start up rate if we are to change the enterprise culture in this community. | We need to help more people believe that they can take action to make things better -in whatever ways matter to them. |
| We encourage people to start business quickly. That helps us to keep up with our contract outputs – and anyway you don’t really learn about business until you are in it – do you? | We help clients start business slowly, if at all. We make sure that they have done as much planning, research and training as possible before they start and got a strong management team in place to reduce the risks of failure. If they have an alternative to starting a small business we encourage them to consider it – SERIOUSLY! We understand just how hard small business can be. |
| We spend a lot of money on publicity and events to attract large numbers (we wish!) to use the service. | We spend almost nothing on publicity. Instead we focus on building a great reputation (we know how to do this) and then encourage word of mouth strategies, referrals and clients telling their stories to gradually build interest. |
| We usually start with a bang – but numbers quickly tail off – unless we keep the marketing spend up. We refer clients into mainstream business support or other sources of support as soon as we can. Our job is just to get them engaged. | We start slowly and build exponentially as our reputation spreads. Within 12 months we would expect top be seeing 200 people a year with about 10% of them going on to start a new business. Because of our reputation we also get some existing business wanting to talk with us – but that is ok because we know how to help them too! |
| We do all we can to keep people engaged with our service. We pay bus fares, pick them up in our cars, provide child care and food to make it easy. | We do little to keep people using the service – other than help them build their confidence and self belief in what they can achieve when they work with us. |
| We don’t mention business failure rates. If we start enough – surely some of them will survive? | We monitor survival rates more closely than start up rates. We understand that it is business failures that establish a fear of enterprise and do most to damage an enterprise culture. |
| We design and deliver our services and interventions to deliver policy goals for number of interventions and start-ups | We design and deliver our services with the client needs at the centre of things. Our service is free of charge, competent, compassionate and easy to access. |
| We believe that primarily our clients need help to develop their ideas from a technical point of view. It is all about the business plan. The sooner we can refer them onto a technical expert – such as a business adviser the better. | We believe that the idea and the business plan is one small aspect of our work. More important is helping the client to develop their skills and their passion and commitment towards making real progress in their lives. Understanding psychology is just as important as understanding business. We develop the people – so that if they want they can develop their business ideas. |
| I don’t need to build a strong relationship – I just need to find people and refer them to mainstream business advisers. | It is the quality of my relationship with you that dictates how useful it is. |